Ankylosing Spondylitis Research Today is a free monthly online journal that collates and summarizes the latest research about Ankylosing Spondylitis, including details on diagnosis, treatment, symptoms, causes.

Scoring of radiographic progression in randomised clinical trials in ankylosing spondylitis: a preference for paired reading order.

Wanders A, Landewé R, Spoorenberg A, de Vlam K, Mielants H, Dougados M, van der Linden S, van der Heijde D

Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, University Hospital Maastricht, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the influence of the reading order (chronological v paired) on radiographic scoring results in ankylosing spondylitis. To investigate whether this method is sufficiently sensitive to change because paired reading is requested for establishing drug efficacy in clinical trials. METHODS: Films obtained from 166 patients (at baseline, 1 year, and 2 years) were scored by one observer, using the modified Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spinal Score. Films were first scored chronologically, and were scored paired 6 months later. RESULTS: Chronological reading showed significantly more progression than paired reading both at 1 year (mean (SD) progression 1.3 (2.6) v 0.5 (2.4) units) and at 2 years (2.1 (3.9) v 1.0 (2.9) units); between-method difference: p<0.001 at 1 year, and p<0.001 at 2 years. After 1 year, progression (>0 units) was found in 35/166 (21%) patients after paired reading and in 55/166 (33%) after chronological reading. After 2 years, these figures were 50/166 (30%) and 68/166 (41%), respectively. Sample size calculations showed that 94 patients in each treatment arm are required in a randomised clinical trial (RCT) to provide sufficient statistical power to detect a difference in 2 year progression if films are scored paired. CONCLUSION: Reading with chronological time order is more sensitive to change than reading with paired time order, but paired reading is sufficiently sensitive to pick up change with a follow up of 2 years, resulting in an acceptable sample size for RCTs.

Published 19 November 2004 in Ann Rheum Dis, 63(12): 1601-4.
Full-text of this article is available online (may require subscription).

© 2004-2008 Ankylosing Spondylitis Research Today. All Rights Reserved.